Lets suppose I would like to organise a discussion. I could represent it graphically like this :
or like , that, with blocks and details
For Bigger maps, I may want more finesse and details, and pursue on execution (I take a decision and implements it with tasks) :
for this I have arrows type :
for very large systems, I may have maps of maps :
The Cross-link lets you make direct, meaningful connections (cross-relations) between ideas anywhere on the same map or on different maps.
Cross-relations are used to signal different types of relationship to those expressed in the hierarchical structure of the map. The current set of available cross-relations includes:
this is DebateGraph
Usage .
- Organisation : complex thinking in an organisation, communities, organise long threaded debates ( Asynchronous and multisites) , and provide visual support to avoid confusion
- Individual(s) : Exploring Topics Together (Asynchronously)
- Individual : Oulining papers, essays
Next Steps :
- Explore the tool (Experiment),
- Private Maps (ok),
- Explore Collaborative options ( opinions)
- Export Options( visual , texts)
- versionning
Related:
[[20181118093722]] animer une communauté
Tags:
#cognitive, #spiral, #argument, #complexity
Main Reference:
The tool : DebateGraph.org
Source Found : Debate tools
Other References
